Now, the court has given a verdict and asked the state government to https://www.religious-rosary.com take steps and give protection to all those ladies who want to perform their religious rights," she says. And while it was a social movement on the basic level, it had a serious religious outlining as well. Raja Ram Mohan Roy had to fight much opposition when he tried to abolish Sati. Nilima is happy about the High Court’s observation, but it isn’t exactly a ‘victory’ in the conventional sense, she reminds us. "There was a law in existence and constitutional provisions were always there," she says referring to the Maharashtra Hindu Place of Worship Act, 1956. The system was pitting women against other women and no religion propagates that," she explains."The Shani Shingnapur incident is known to have roused a rare agitation that saw multiple aggressive clashes between female devotees and government authorities. "Despite that, there is discrimination going on in the country. "I follow a certain religious philosophy too, but that is within the confines of my house. Having said that, it’s good news nevertheless. But, I would’ve been happier if some more pro-active action came from the government officials rather than the villagers and trustees. I do not believe in publicly professing my religious beliefs.

The landmark move came about after the Bombay High Court earlier this month, backed a woman’s right to enter the temple.While the laws are firmly in place to fight any prejudice against female devotees in temples, the bigger challenge is to overcome social obstacles, Nilima observes, "Certain beliefs are deep-rooted in our society.　　A woman’s right to enter a temple was the focal point of this courageous woman’s campaign.The day April 8 2016 was a milestone in the history of the much-revered Shani Shingnapur Temple in Maharashtra. Most women who fought blows of the police outside the temple premises were self-confessed Shani-bhakts. We asked for general directions to implement the law that was already in existence. Nilima however isn’t on the same page. The reason I stood up for this cause is because I saw it as suppression of women."Does that mean the battle will trickle to other places of worship such a Haji Ali or Sabrimala where women are not allowed inside the sanctorum Referring to a technicality, she explains, "The Bombay High Court’s observation refers to the Maharashtra Hindu Place of Worship Act, so that leaves out Haji Ali and Sabrimala for religious and geographical reasons, respectively. It wasn’t a petition against any particular temple or place of worship. It is natural for public opinion to shape a certain way when you challenge social norms — sometimes it may work against you — but like I said, that’s no reason to bow down. For the first time in 400 years, female devotees entered its inner sanctum sanctorum and offered prayers to Lord Shani.

It’s part of the challenge.Nilima admittedly has mixed feelings about the second part of the victory as well, "It is certainly a positive development that women entered the inner sanctum, there is no doubt about it. When I filed the PIL, there were ‘religious heads’ or ‘fake’ religious heads as I call them, who said that I was going against society and religion. But that doesn’t mean that we don’t fight them. Having said that, the Constitution has similar provisions for all and I’ll be happy to lend my voice if my help is sought. While Trupti Desai, president of the NGO Bhumata Ranragini Brigade may have become the more prominent face of the battle, it was Pune-based public prosecutor Nilima Vartak who launched a legal campaign against what she felt was a ‘blatant discrimination against women’.

He also appealed to leaders of all religions to wait for the apex court’s judgment in the case and respect its verdict."Religious fanatics, be it Hindu or Muslim, cannot allow a solution," he said."Looking at the present atmosphere, aware citizens and followers of religions cannot agree upon any https://www.religious-rosary.com/ settlement outside the court, so people should wait and respect the apex court’s verdict," Khan said.In his address, he also stressed on efforts to promoted women empowerment. Religious and political organisations should stop politics on such cases and not engage youths in religious fanaticism as such politics leads to hatred in society, Khan said.
Jaipur: The spiritual head of the Ajmer Dargah in Rajasthan, Zainul Abedin Ali Khan, on Saturday  said the solution to sensitive issues like the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case lies with the Supreme Court.Khan was addressing chiefs of various shrines during the ongoing Urs of Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti in Ajmer.Present religious, political and cultural organisations are not being able to provide a practical solution to the disputed site in  Ayodhya and there is doubt among followers of all religions, he said.. Efforts to settle the matter outside the court were also unsuccessful and, hence, the court’s decision (in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Mas-jid case) should be respected in the interest of the country," he said. Youths today need opportunities to grow and prosper."Religious fanaticism cannot provide solutions. He is the Deewan of the dargah.

While stating that no ``artificial controversy’’ should be created around his present visit to Arunachal Pradesh, the External Affairs Ministry also referred to the Dalai Lama’s website which mentions that he has visited Arunachal Pradesh on six earlier occasions. He claimed that the Arunachal Pradesh government has given state guest honour to the Dalai Lama and is making arrangements for his stay there and that the Tibetan spiritual leader will also visit his village in West Kameng district where he would inaugurate a Buddhist monastery."There may be some differences of opinion between India and China over the boundary."I appeal to China not to rake up the Arunachal Pradesh issue unnecessarily as status of the state can’t be questioned,’’ he added.’’

Mr Rijiju, who is from Arunachal Pradesh, said the border state was "not a disputed territory’’ as it was a "full fledged state’’ and was an integral part and is part of the Union of India. Dalai Lama had last visited Arunachal Pradesh in November 2009. He further added that India has never interfered in China’s internal affairs and it expect China to reciprocate."As a democratic country, India can’t interfere in religious affairs of any community," Mr Rijiju said.Minister of state for home Kiren Rijiju said, "there is no political angle behind His Holiness’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh.New Delhi: In a stern message to China on Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Rosary Chain Suppliers Pradesh, India has asked Beijing not interfere in its internal affairs, saying while it respects the "One China’’ policy, it expects the same from China. Arunachal Pradesh is an inseparable part of India and China should not object to his visit and interfere in India’s internal affairs.

Mr Rijiju reiterated that people of Arunachal Pradesh want good neighbourly relations with China and want reopening of trading points along the McMahon Line which have been closed since 1962. But China has no locus standi over Arunachal Pradesh,’’ the minister said. "The trading points were beneficial.’’ Centre has always stated that the Dalai Lama is a revered religious leader who is deeply respected by the Indian people. The people of Arunachal Pradesh are looking toward co-operative attitude from China,’’ he said. It is completely religious. He also hoped that with talks on boundary dispute between New Delhi and Beijing going on, people of Arunachal Pradesh are expecting that the issue would be soon resolved. China has been closely monitoring Dalai Lama’s visit, which started from Tuesday, and had warned India against the visit of the Tibetan spiritual leader to Arunachal Pradesh, saying it will cause "serious damage’’ to bilateral ties. Mr Rijiju said the Dalai Lama is visiting Arunachal Pradesh on invitation from people of the state and will confine himself to only religious discourse and he will not make any political statement. But New Delhi has maintained that ``no additional colour should be ascribed to his religious and spiritual activities and visits to various states of India.

Dera followers had alleged that Mr Sharda had hurt their religious sentiments by mimicking their sect head Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh in an episode of the TV show aired on December 27.Mr Sharda, 40, was sent to 14-day judicial custody after the police produced him before the court of chief judicial magistrate Nandita Kaushik here.Hours after Mr Sharda’s remand, CJM Kaushik granted him bail in the evening on furnishing a bail bond of `1 lakh.A case was registered on the complaint of one Uday Singh, a follower of Sirsa-based Dera Sacha Sauda, the police https://www.religious-rosary.com/ said here.
If he has apologised, no complaint from my side.While talking to media after his arrest, Mr Sharda apologised and said that he was an artist and "presented the programme on the directions of the TV channel and programme producers".Comedian Kiku Sharda, best known for his drag act as Palak in popular TV show "Comedy Nights With Kapil, was on Wednesday arrested by the Haryana police on a complaint alleging he hurt religious sentiments by mocking Dera Sacha Sauda sect head Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh.The bail order came after the Dera head in a tweet said.
"I was busy shooting OnlineGurukul; just got to know devotees are hurt due to Kiku’s action.He said that his aim was only to entertain the public and not to hurt the religious feeling and sentiments of any person.Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar said the state government has nothing to do with the arrest of Mr Sharda.. He was arrested from Mumbai by the Haryana police."I was given a dress, script to read and directed to act," he said, adding that he had been booked in this case but no action was taken against others including the TV channel which aired the show."Mr Sharda was booked on December 31 under section 295 A of the Indian Penal Code (outraging religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious belief).

"She says, "This verdict in itself reflects how inherently patriarchal our society is. If women can’t voice their opinion and desires, it speaks a lot about our country. So in such times, if there is a verdict related to freedom of women, I feel it’s mere tokenism. While this verdict hasn’t really helped people in general and those involved in this specific case, I hope it helps the cause of gender equality in the future. But no one can question an adult woman’s choices. But these things are being targeted more these days so that mindsets can be affected."Director Avinash Das finds it mere tokenism. So the verdict is just a reinstatement of the constitution.The Hadiya case was not the first time that a Muslim woman married outside her religion. The ruling party is gaining from caste and communal divide.In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India declared that an adult woman has the right to live freely and choose a life of her choice. The Hadiya case was not the first time that a Muslim woman married outside her religion. The more we talk about it, the more we move closer to the vision of equality," she signs off. He says, "We are living in times where four judges from the Supreme Court have to collectively tell the media that there are a lot of problematic https://www.religious-rosary.com/ things happening in the Supreme Court.

I mean, don’t we know that? Do we need a statement from a court to understand this?— Kamla Bhasin, Feminist activistThe Constitution of India never said women can’t live freely. Why would an adult woman need a guardian in the first place or be subject to moral policing? It is really sad that women in India have to approach the courts to be able to marry, live with the person of their choice, study or change their religion. So the verdict is just a reinstatement of the constitution. The constitution already has given us these freedoms, so the court has done nothing great. Riya Aen, Actor. So the verdict highlights how sad the situation is.Feminist activist and author Kamla Bhasin says, "It is very sad that the Supreme Court has to say that adult women in India are free. But these things are being targeted more these days so that mindsets can be affected. We don’t need the Supreme Court to tell us this, it should be common sense. Avinash Das,Film directorIt is very sad that the Supreme Court has to say that adult women in India are free. I mean, don’t we know that? Do we need a statement from a court to understand this?"The Supreme Court passed this verdict in the Hadiya case. What is even more saddening is that the verdict before this one was against her will and was highly patriarchal. When Akhila married a Muslim man called Shafin, embraced Islam and changed her name to Hadiya, little did she know that she would become the poster-child of ‘Love-Jihad’ controversies in India and have to walk a long road to freedom. "I am really glad that the Supreme Court said it categorically.

However, I married a Muslim when BJP was not in power and I still faced a lot of issues.Nikita Azad, founder of the campaign Happyto Bleed and a member of feminist collective, PinjraTod, says, "At one level, it is a good judgement, but why did it take so long for the court to come to this verdict? In an ideal world, the idea of such a verdict should be beyond imagination."However, Bhasin sees a silver lining in the verdict. It won’t really change things in the country. It is the politicians who need to take the right stand."Expressing her opinion on the verdict, actress Riya Sen says, "The Constitution of India never said women can’t live freely. The constitution already has given us these freedoms, so the court has done nothing great."She adds, "No educational institution or family member or husband should be a guardian to an adult woman. That this needed to be reiterated by the court is a pointer to how this basic right and freedom is still denied to many in the country. People didn’t accept such marriages before and it’s the same now. "The truth is that BJP is in power, so many people are saying that issues related to inter-caste and inter-religious marriages are being created."On the other hand, Arshiya Ismail, who was a Hindu before she had an inter-religious marriage, disagrees slightly. Caste and religious differences have always affected the choices of women.A shot from Ishaqzaade that depicted an inter-religious romance.

Godfrey Pimenta from Watchdog Foundation said that an error while marking religious structures belonging to numerous faiths is a serious matter.Apart from scrapping the proposed Development Plan, https://www.religious-rosary.com/ the Foundation has demanded arrest of the BMC officials involved with the DP. Michael’s Church (Mahim), a number structures are either absent or wrongly marked in the submitted document. While the RDDP has correctly marked structures like Babulnath Temple (Malabar Hill) and St."If Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation can list approximately 12,000 religious and heritage structures on its Development Plan, what prevented the BMC from doing it so correctly.

These officials who carried out the survey either lacked requisite qualifications or did their job within the four walls of their offices using Google Maps," said Mr Pimenta. Sri Sri Radhe Gopinath Temple, near Wilson College, Girgaon has also been wrongly marked as a primary and secondary school. Moreover, Jama Masjid near Mangaldas Market and Mumbadevi Temple at Bhuleshwar are shown as commercial areas while Haji Ali Dargah, Mahalaxmi Mandir and Siddhivinayak Temple are shown as residential areas with a four-metre wide pedestrian walkway on stilts as proposed from the Junction of Cadbury House to the Temple. As major religious places like Kenesenth Eliyahoo Synagogue (Kalaghoda), Nipponzan Myohoji Temple (Worli), Babu Amichand Panalal Adihwarji Jain Temple (Malabar Hill) aren’t marked in the RDDP.Two days after BMC officials released the Revised Draft Development Plan 2034, social activists are crying foul over the faulty demarcation of the important religious and heritage structures like Mumbadevi Temple, Mahim Dargah, Parsi Fire Temple amongst several others.

The RDDP 2014-2034 was prepared by about 530 engineers, town planners and other supporting staff from 24 Municipal Wards post rectification of the previous draft, which was also scrapped by the state government. However, even after extensive research and planning, a number of religious locations are wrongly marked in the RDDP. Irked activists have threatened to raise strong protest and demanded arrest of the officials, scrapping of the proposed RDDP 2034, alleging violation of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 for committing technical errors and hurting religious sentiments.

He has not seen "Star Wars: The Force Awakens.Obama has too many of the mementoes to carry all of them around "but I’ll pick out a few things."Asked by "sWooZie" who would emerge victorious if musicians Drake and Kendrick Lamar faced off in a rap battle, Obama chose Lamar. One of his interviewers had asked ahead of time for Obama to bring a meaningful item and talk about it.." Last year Obama praised Lamar’s song, "How Much a Dollar Cost."The upshot: Obama realises "I better get back to work.".to remind me of all the people I’ve met along the way and the stories they told me," he told Ingrid Nilsen of Los Angeles."I would want it to be stable," Obama said."The president made the revelation on Friday during separate interviews with three https://www.religious-rosary.com/ YouTube personalities.The interviews were part of a continuing White House strategy to reach different audiences and keep alive discussion of themes from Tuesday’s State of the Union address..When asked, Obama pulled quite an assortment from his right pants pocket: rosary beads from Pope Francis, a tiny Buddha, a metal poker chip he said came from a bald biker with a handlebar mustache he met in Iowa in 2007, a Coptic cross from Ethiopia and a statuette of God Hanuman. She’s known as "Missglamorazzi" on the video sharing website.Sandlin, who said he holds a civilian job at the Department of Defense, asked Obama to describe the characteristics of "Obamium," a hypothetical element named after him.For inspiration he carries some of the keepsakes people have given him since he started running for office. He was prepared. "I would want it to be a catalyst, but one that didn’t get too hot or too cold, and hopefully, it would be one that was useful to humanity, that we could actually use and wasn’t just some shiny object.Washington: When President Barack Obama feels tired or discouraged, reaching into his pocket can help him get over it. Obama was also questioned by Adande Thorne, a video game enthusiast from Orlando, Florida, known online as "sWooZie," and Destin Sandlin, an Alabaman who is into science and makes educational videos."Obama said his favorite movie last year was "The Martian," starring Matt Damon. He says that helps him cope on a bad day "because somebody gave me this privilege to work on these issues that are going to affect them. He said Drake is an "outstanding entertainer," but that Lamar had the best album last year, titled "To Pimp a Butterfly.For inspiration he carries some of the keepsakes people have given him since he started running for office.

"If a rolling stone gathers no mossAnd a magpie never builds a nestWhat of a heart that knows no restAnd a rosary that counts the loss "From Cleopatra ni Machchi by BachchooNo one outside India and probably very few Indians could tell you who Gulzarilal Nanda was and what he did. So also, I am sometimes surprised while reading answers to obscure quizzes, to come across the name of an American President of whom I have never heard.Winston Churchill and perhaps Margaret Thatcher, not to mention Pitt the Younger, are names which any British schoolchild, and perhaps even an Indian one, will recognise. Not so, I expect Margaret’s successor as Prime Minister John Major.Mr Major is still relatively young and, now and then, ventures a publicised, political opinion. He must have been offered a peerage but declined it. He was a modest, intelligent Prime Minister, the son of a father who worked in the circus. Mr Major became an accountant and gave rise to the witticism that he was the only individual in history who ran away from the circus to become an accountant (instead of running away from accountancy to join etc.)But this is not an obituary, so no more about him except to say that he was one of the recent British Prime Ministers to be https://www.religious-rosary.com/ caught up in the British obsession of to be or not to be a member of the European Union. The question, sometimes in a milder form of how much to integrate with the other states of Europe, has threatened on several occasions to tear the Conservative Party apart. There are some senior Tory politicians such a Kenneth Clark who believe in being part of the EU and going the further step of joining the monetary union, substituting the euro for pound sterling and signing up to more treaties for ever closer relations. There are others such as the former leader of the party Michael Howard and former Chancellor Nigel Lawson who want out; and still others, such as Prime Minister David Cameron who has been inners and outers at different times. When Mr Major was Prime Minister he had, in July 1993, to take a decision on signing the Maastricht Treaty which would create the European Union and, for those countries who wanted to join it, the common currency. Twenty-two of his MPs declared their absolute opposition to the treaty. Mr Major cajoled, threatened and offered compromises and bribes, but the rebels were adamant. Their stubborn opposition and disruptive determination, which went so far as to fly dangerously-ill MPs from Scotland, hide them in the sick-rooms of the Commons and drag them in on stretchers when the vote was called, won them the Prime Minister’s lasting disapproval. He called them "bastards". His epithet was widely reported in the press. He didn’t mean to imply that any of the rebels were born out of wedlock. The word has, except in very primitive usage by primitive or religiously governed minds, lost that connotation altogether. Most children born in Britain today are born out of wedlock. Their parents haven’t sought the sanction of law or religion in order to conceive and give birth to babies. I remember, when still an infant or early teenager, using the English word as an abusive expletive without knowing what it meant. The word was in our English-medium-school sometimes euphemised into "basket", sometimes adjectivally qualified with a sanguine oath. (Okay, we said "bloody basket!").The word undoubtedly retains, as my online dictionary tells me, its original meaning. The dictionary goes on to list as "slang" the definition: "a vicious, despicable or thoroughly disliked person".Obviously this meaning, as does the Hindustani equivalent "harami", derives from the birth of an individual without having religious sanction. Without the benediction of God or Allah for the union of your parents, you become "base", haram, outside the moral frame.My online, and for that matter my Greater Oxford, dictionary doesn’t specify when the second meaning came into vogue, but my literary ramblings give me a clue. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, two elder daughters of the king are greedy, capricious, hypocritical and cruel but they are not bastards. The villain of the play is the Duke of Gloucester’s son Edmund. We hear that he was born illegitimately and he knows it. He rebels and rails against the status that this bastardy gives him or deprives him of. He is bitter about his legitimate half-brother Edgar and his evil plots result in blinding his father and driving his brother into beggary and feigned madness.Shakespeare gets Edmund in a soliloquy to question the term and why one meaning has generated the other. So for me that’s when the conflation of meanings begins to be enshrined in literature, though now that conflation has been eroded and for us a bastard is just someone who has wantonly slashed the tyres on your car or cheated you in some conniving way. But back to the British Parliament. As Mr Major was, Mr Cameron finds himself presiding over a Tory Party and government implacably divided over Europe.The Tory election manifesto promised the British electorate an in/out referendum on the EU after the government negotiated some new terms for Britain. The negotiations are over and the referendum is scheduled for June. Mr Cameron advocates staying in. Boris Johnson, mayor of London, MP for Uxbridge and extraordinary minister without portfolio in the government has declared that he is for a British exit, or Brexit as it has been labelled. So has Michael Gove, the justice secretary who is trusted by the population as a thinker and honest Joe. It is no secret that Mr Johnson wants to succeed Mr Cameron as Prime Minister and he is taking a gamble. If the Brexit-wallahs win, he will certainly be seen as the natural successor. If not he has acquired the status of "bastard" and may have to accept the fate of Edmund in King Lear.

Khwaja Ghulam Farid is among my favourite Sufi poets of the subcontinent.Known for pluralistic religious symbols to express his religious devotion and belief in the oneness of God, Khwaja Ghulam Farid in another verse writes, "Day and night, morning and evening, My ears hear Krishna’s flute, From the first day Ranjha graciously, plays his holy flute and lets me hear, celestial music in the mode of unity. He wrote of the pain of separation from the divine and the love of God, the beloved. Although Ghulam Farid wrote primarily in Saraiki, he wrote numerous kaafis in Persian, Sindhi and Brij bhasha. Kaafis are musical composition with a distinct melody and rhyme scheme with a refrain; ideal for singing. At the age of 13, he became a disciple of his elder brother, Khwaja Fakhruddin."In a series of kaafis that allude to praising of Prophet Muhammad, he writes, "May I call you a mosque, temple and church May I call you the Veda and the Quran May I call you a rosary May I call you a cross thread May I describe you as infidelity May I describe you as faith May I call you Dashrat, Lakshman and Ram May I call you my beloved Sita May I call you Baldev, Jaswada and Nund May I call you Krishan, Kanhaiya and Kanha May I call you Gita, Granth and Veda, O essential beauty! The primordial light! May I call https://www.religious-rosary.com you the witness in the city of Hejaz May I describe you as the reason for the creation of this cosmos "Sadia Dehlvi is a Delhi-based writer and author of Sufism: The Heart of Islam.When Khwaja Ghulam Farid reached the age of 28, his brother and mentor died; the responsibility of carrying on the family’s spiritual legacy falling on him. The late 19th century poet of the Saraiki language articulated Sufi philosophy in the kaafi style of verse. It is an amazing collection of 272 kaafis, diverse in language, content and style.com.He was born in 1845 CE to a family of Arab settlers from Mithankot in Punjab. The royal families of Bahawalpur were disciples of Khwaja Ghulam Farid’s family. His mother died when he was four years old. Khwaja Ghulam Farid’s poetry includes references to both traditional Islamic and local cultures. Earlier poets who wrote kaafis, included Bulleh Shah, Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, Madho Lal Hussaini and Sachal Sarmast. Kaafis are an indigenous form of traditional Sufi verse, called Wai in Sindhi, used by both Sindhi and Punjabi Sufi poets. He is buried in a beautiful mausoleum in Mithankot, now in Pakistan. A Sufi scholar of the Chishti Sufi order, he authored several books of poetry of which the Dewan-e-Farid is the most well-known.